Unemployment
Unemployment: Types, Causes & Policies
Unemployment occurs when people who are of working age, able and willing to work, and actively seeking employment cannot find a job. It is a key macroeconomic indicator with significant economic, social, and political consequences.
Types of Unemployment
1. Frictional Unemployment
- Workers between jobs — searching for a better match
- Inevitable in a dynamic economy (people change careers, graduates enter the market)
- Usually short-term and voluntary (in the sense that workers choose to search)
- Reduced by: better job information (online job boards), employment agencies, lower job search costs
2. Structural Unemployment
- A mismatch between workers' skills/location and available jobs
- Caused by:
- Sectoral decline: loss of manufacturing, mining, shipbuilding in the UK
- Technological change: automation replacing routine jobs
- Geographical immobility: workers unable to move to where jobs exist (housing costs, family ties)
- Occupational immobility: workers lack skills for new industries
- Can be long-term and concentrated in specific regions (deindustrialisation of Northern England, Wales)
- Addressed by: retraining programmes, education reform, relocation subsidies, enterprise zones
3. Cyclical (Demand-Deficient) Unemployment
- Caused by a fall in aggregate demand during the downturn phase of the business cycle
- Firms reduce output and lay off workers as demand falls
- The most significant type during recessions (2008-09: UK unemployment rose from 5.2% to 8.5%)
- Keynesian view: the economy can settle at an equilibrium below full employment — government must intervene
- Classical view: wages should fall to clear the labour market — unemployment is voluntary if wages are flexible
- Addressed by: expansionary fiscal and monetary policy (increase AD)
4. Real Wage (Classical) Unemployment
- Occurs when wages are held above the market-clearing level
- Causes: minimum wage above equilibrium, trade union power, efficiency wages
- Creates excess supply of labour (more people want to work than firms want to hire)
- Classical/neoclassical economists emphasise this type
- Addressed by: reducing labour market rigidities, reforming benefits to increase work incentives
5. Seasonal Unemployment
- Regular, predictable fluctuations in demand for labour (tourism in summer, agriculture at harvest)
- Data is usually seasonally adjusted to remove this effect
The Natural Rate of Unemployment (NRU)
The NRU (or NAIRU — Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment) is the rate of unemployment when the labour market is in equilibrium — consistent with stable inflation.
It includes:
- Frictional unemployment (search/transition)
- Structural unemployment (mismatch)
- Seasonal unemployment
It does not include cyclical unemployment (which is zero at NRU).
Determinants of NRU:
- Labour market flexibility (ease of hiring/firing)
- Skills match between workers and vacancies
- Unemployment benefits (replacement ratio — if benefits are close to wages, less incentive to work)
- Labour market information (how easily workers find vacancies)
- Geographical/occupational mobility
- Trade union power
- Hysteresis effects (prolonged unemployment makes workers less employable)
Supply-side policies aim to reduce the NRU.
Costs of Unemployment
Economic Costs
- Lost output: economy operates inside its PPF — opportunity cost of unemployed resources
- Fiscal costs: government pays more benefits, collects less tax revenue → budget deficit widens
- Loss of human capital: skills atrophy during unemployment, reducing future productivity
- Hysteresis: prolonged unemployment may permanently raise the NRU (workers become discouraged and unemployable)
- Lower consumer spending: unemployed have lower income → reduced AD → potential deflationary spiral
Social Costs
- Poverty and deprivation: lower living standards for individuals and families
- Health impacts: stress, mental health problems, higher mortality (studies show unemployed people have worse health outcomes)
- Crime and social exclusion: unemployment correlates with higher crime rates, drug abuse
- Regional disparities: concentrated unemployment creates "left-behind" areas
- Intergenerational effects: children in workless households have poorer educational and employment outcomes
Can Any Unemployment Be Beneficial?
- Frictional unemployment enables better job matching → higher productivity
- Creative destruction (Schumpeter): some unemployment accompanies structural change that makes the economy more innovative and productive in the long run
- A small amount of unemployment may reduce wage-push inflation (the Phillips curve)
Policies to Reduce Unemployment
Demand-Side Policies (for cyclical unemployment)
Fiscal policy:
- Increase government spending or cut taxes to boost AD
- Evaluation: multiplier effect amplifies impact; but time lags, crowding out, and national debt concerns limit effectiveness; risk of inflation if economy is near capacity
Monetary policy:
- Cut interest rates to reduce borrowing costs → increase C and I
- Quantitative easing (QE): central bank buys bonds → increases money supply → lowers long-term rates
- Evaluation: effective tool but limited at the zero lower bound; transmission mechanism may be weak if banks do not lend; QE may inflate asset prices more than real economic activity
Supply-Side Policies (for structural/frictional/NRU)
| Policy | Target | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Education and training | Skills mismatch | Long-term but slow; quality matters; may not match employer needs |
| Apprenticeships | Youth unemployment, skills gaps | Effective if well-designed; UK apprenticeship levy introduced 2017 |
| Employment subsidies | Reduce cost of hiring | Direct but costly; may subsidise jobs that would exist anyway (deadweight) |
| Welfare reform | Increase work incentives | Universal Credit taper rate; but risks increasing poverty if benefits cut too far |
| Deregulation of labour markets | Reduce hiring costs | May increase flexibility but at cost of job security (gig economy concerns) |
| Regional policy | Geographical immobility | Enterprise zones, infrastructure investment; but expensive and slow |
| Improved job information | Frictional unemployment | Job centres, online platforms; low cost, effective |
| Reducing trade union power | Real wage unemployment | Thatcher's reforms in 1980s; controversial — weakens worker bargaining |
The Phillips Curve and Unemployment
Short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment:
- Reducing unemployment below the NRU via demand management → inflation accelerates
- Reducing inflation → unemployment rises (at least temporarily)
- Long-run: Phillips curve is vertical at NRU (Friedman/Phelps)
- Only supply-side policies can permanently reduce unemployment without inflation
Evaluation: Is Full Employment Achievable?
- Full employment does not mean zero unemployment — it means unemployment at the NRU (frictional + structural only)
- The UK target is typically an unemployment rate of ~4-5%
- Keynesian view: government can and should use demand management to keep unemployment low
- Classical/monetarist view: focus on supply-side policies; demand management only creates temporary reductions and long-run inflation
- Real-world: most governments use a combination of demand-side and supply-side policies
- Globalisation and technology continue to cause structural shifts, requiring continuous adaptation
Exam Technique
- Classify the type of unemployment before recommending policy — demand-side policies will not solve structural unemployment
- Use AD/AS and labour market diagrams to illustrate
- Discuss the Phillips curve trade-off and its limitations
- Evaluate policies by considering effectiveness, time lags, side effects, and political feasibility
- Reference UK data and examples (2008 recession, COVID-19 furlough scheme, regional disparities)
- In 25-mark essays, consider whether demand-side or supply-side policies are more effective — the answer usually depends on the type and cause of unemployment