Comparing and Evaluating Texts
Comparing and evaluating texts
Two higher-level reading skills come together in GCSE English Language: comparing two texts, and evaluating how successfully a writer achieves something. Both need a personal, critical response backed by evidence.
Comparing texts
When comparing (e.g. AQA Paper 2 Q4), explore how two writers present ideas, attitudes or perspectives — and the methods they use.
- Cover both the perspective (what each writer thinks) and the method (how they show it).
- Use a point-by-point structure: make a point, give evidence from both texts, then compare directly.
- Use comparative connectives: similarly, whereas, in contrast, both, unlike.
Evaluating texts
When evaluating (e.g. AQA Paper 1 Q4), you judge how effectively a writer creates an effect, responding to a statement in the question.
- Give a clear critical judgement (agree / partly agree).
- Support it with quotations, analysis of methods, and comments on how successful the writing is.
- Use evaluative words: effective, successful, convincing, powerful.
The shared skill: evidence + analysis + judgement
Both tasks go beyond retrieval. For each point:
1. Point (comparison or judgement).
2. Evidence (precise quotation).
3. Analysis (method + effect).
4. Comparison / evaluation (link the texts, or judge effectiveness).
Worked example (comparison)
Both writers criticise city life. The first calls it a "concrete prison" — a metaphor suggesting entrapment. Whereas the second uses sarcasm, praising its "delightful" traffic, mocking the reality. Both convey frustration, but through different tones. ✓
Common mistakes
- Comparing texts separately instead of point-by-point.
- Evaluating without referring to the statement.
- Analysing content only, forgetting the methods.
Exam tips
- For comparison, always link both texts in each paragraph with connectives.
- For evaluation, keep referring to the statement and judge effectiveness.
- Support every point with a precise quotation and analysis.
Quick recap
- Compare = perspective + method of two texts, point-by-point with connectives.
- Evaluate = judge how successfully a writer achieves an effect, tied to the statement.
- Both need evidence + analysis + a critical judgement (not just retrieval).